One of the most watched commentators in America

Archive for the ‘Articles’ Category

McAllister to Debate Gun Control Live in The Bronx June 5

In Articles on May 15, 2013 at 11:15 am
Riverdale Y promo

“…the issue of gun violence in our communities is not a matter of gun control – it is a matter concerning the lack of widespread economic vitality. Once we successfully address (that)…our neighborhoods will become (more stable and) stronger…”

NEW YORK (May 15, 2013) – “Primarily, the issue of gun violence in our communities is not a matter of gun control – it is a matter concerning the lack of widespread economic vitality. Once we successfully address the economic death that lingers in our communities, our families will become more stable, our schools will become better funded and more capable, and our neighborhoods will become stronger – all forcing the allure of gun violence and the subsequent loss of life to lessen its grip on our youth and tragic impact on our lives.”

 

Lenny McAllister, the “Working Man’s Conservative”, Republican strategist and pundit, and former congressional candidate (Illinois-2nd) will be a featured panelist in the Rose Dialogue Series debate, “Gun Control or Out of Control?” on June 5 in New York City. The series is hosted by the Riverdale Y in the Bronx.

McAllister will appear opposite Michael Skolnik, GlobalGrind.com administrator and political director for hip hop mogul Russell Simmons. The discussion will be led by Fox News Contributor Sally Kohn.

Tickets for this exciting night of dialogue are $18.  Reservations can be made at www.RiverdaleY.org or clicking the picture above.

 

Catch Lenny McAllister and others in this trailer for the much-anticipated documentary, “Black Tea: The New Civil Right”(www.blackteadocumentary.com), by clicking the link HERE

Watch more of Lenny’s previous appearances

Loud Enough, But Listening Is Required before Leadership is Earned

In Articles on March 15, 2013 at 9:36 am
The conservative voice of the 21st century has been heard in all four corners of the nation, but until there is more listening involved in the process, we won’t earn the privilege to lead.

The conservative voice of the 21st century has been heard in all four corners of the nation, but until there is more listening involved in the process, we won’t earn the privilege to lead.

CHICAGO (March 15, 2013) — CPAC 2013 is upon us and the time is ripe – again – for conservatives to gather, be heard, and extol the values that we believe made this nation great for decades. It serves as another opportunity for us to show the nation – and perhaps, even ourselves – that if we present our views in a united voice, our message will be heard across the nation,  particularly by new section of voters that we need in order to win elections. Generally speaking, it is our hope that, in time, will win more Americans over to support our political viewpoints and organizations.

 

For years now, we have felt that it is a matter of making sure that we have our conservative message and values heard. “If only the American people could hear our message – if only the mainstream media would give us a chance to articulate our views fairly or if only minority communities gave us a chance to talk to them without emotional obstacles,” we often say, “then we would be able to win more elections and subsequently turn around the woes of our countrymen.” Just the same, we continue to say and hear that “…if only we had a chance to re-package our message – present it in a way that looked more familiar to 21st century voters and non-traditional supporters – our problems would be solved for both the Republican Party and the larger conservative movement…”

 

In essence, we believe that if only we had the chance to be heard, we would seize the opportunity the opportunity to win.

 

However, that is not quite the same as seizing the opportunity to lead.

 

Sadly, we have yet to truly learn as conservatives in 21st century America: leadership is not a function of volume – it is a privilege based on relationships, perceived value, and trust.

 

America hears us loud and clear. Right now, though, they don’t like us, trust us, nor have true relationships with us based on what they’re hearing from us. They do not see us as one of them and, quite honestly, we have done a great job as activists pointing out our differences so that we are not seen as “one of them”. We don’t like each other anymore as Americans. We don’t value our differences anymore as Americans, yet we are working to lead a country full of different lifestyles, perspectives, topographies, and family backgrounds.

 

That works for mere activism. For leadership – something we need in America – that won’t suffice. Leadership is the ability to always be “one of them”, especially during the rough times when our genuine differences are highlighted during those crossroads moments in our history.

 

If we cannot relate to more Americans, are unable to connect to more Americans, and fail to dialogue with more Americans in a true listening relationship, how do we expect to turn around the current construct of politics? How do we expect to be anything more than activists? After all, the current construct of politics views conservatives mostly out-of-touch, hateful isolationists incapable of inspiring much more than their already-assembled cast of characters. Our conservative values are largely seen as thinly-veiled policies that aid the rich and disparage 47% of Americans. Again, that works for activism and lobbying a viewpoint. That may even win elections from time to time. However, that is not enough for leadership.

 

Until those realities change, we will pursue electoral opportunities to lead but we will continue to fall short in our quest to be leaders. We cannot continue to fail at the task of building new relationships, fostering new trust, and presenting ongoing value to the current and future voters in America. Our voices must inspire American voters to hear us and subsequently listen to us, then follow us – and we must do so while maintaining our conservative values and embracing the dynamic of debate that makes democracy great.

 

We desperately want to be heard – and we clearly have been. However, leadership – something we desperately need in America – is a dynamic of listening, particularly at a time when mistrust runs rampant, hope has changed to apathy, and the current political tone (from us and our political adversaries on the left) has made many in America tone deaf to new ideas and a new vision for a better nation. Only through that dynamic can we forge new solutions that are pliant enough to fit across our diversity yet consistent enough to protect and uphold the American Dream.

 

During our fight to be heard in the political banter in ever-changing news cycles, we have forgotten as conservatives that we are fighting to lead a diverse nation full of ever-changing communities. It’s not just about winning elections. It’s truly about winning back the future, a future that includes increased prosperity, safety, and hopeful opportunities to pursue happiness for all Americans. Winning arguments and elections only change the players of the game. Winning the trust of the American people and, thus, the mantle of leadership through relationships where we are listened to and trusted – earning that actually changes the actual political game itself.

 

Activism is fun. Leadership is the job that we have ignored during the process of increasing our collective conservative voice.

 

Our response to the shifting demographics in our cities and throughout many states over the past 20 years has been to increase the volume of our rhetoric and the ferocity of our discontent. Our voice has rung through yet our message has not resonated. As a result, we are renowned within the political discourse but for mixed reasons. Instead of leading new segments of Americans, we have often only gathered up those reacting to the divisiveness that we encountered during the Obama-Pelosi-Reid reign in Washington since 2009. Instead of activating Americans without jobs and losing hope, we have often repulsed those that are looking for true alternatives from considering us as political partners. After years of disappointment following the false promise of post-partisanship and togetherness offered by candidate Obama in 2008, we have lost ground despite our increased activism.

 

And the reason why is simple: activism – regardless of how loud, passionate, and well-funded it may be – is not leadership. Generally speaking, where activism points out problems with vehemence, leadership offers vision with poise.

 

Just as many disillusioned Americans have learned since November 2008, when a movement offers one thing in words but presents more of the status quo in tone and actions, that movement becomes part of the ongoing problem. President Obama gave up the opportunity to be remembered universally for historic leadership in the White House once he caved into the loud cries from his activist base (e.g., partisanship) to take advantage of historic numbers in Congress. Like President Obama, we conservatives have forgotten that we have an obligation to our ancestors and descendents to lead a diverse America, not merely elevate our tone and rhetoric to win the decibel challenge of the day.

 

We have been successful at pointing out the woes faced as a result of out-of-control deficit spending. We have displayed rightful anger at the selfishness of many bureaucrats and elected officials as they continue to ask with their heads in the sand, not their eyes on the prize. There is value in that. Yet, activism ends there. By continuing to focus on volume while ignoring the need to connect more Americans to a better vision, we are still not an option to the growing segments of America that are frustrated with political status quo but see no other alternative to it.  We still cannot enact new policies to bring a better vision for America. We still cannot employ ground-breaking change in dying urban communities or faltering job sectors. We can only illuminate problems; we cannot implement solutions. Despite the growing voices, we still are not leading.

 

Elevated volumes are indicative of activism. Vision that elevates a people is indicative of leadership. We have been heard. It is not time for listening – listening to the diversity of America where they are now so that they can listen to – and believe in – our positions to improve our collective lot as a people.

 

Listening – both active listening as conservatives and effective communication to get others to truly listen to us – is part of the vision-making process necessary to implement effective, historic leadership, especially during these traumatic times. If we are not proverbially and literally in areas where decades-long barriers can be broken down immediately, we are not functionally attuned to the void many face within our borders today. If we are ok with this as conservatives – if we believe that merely gathering the conservative troops is enough to win the political battles we face – then we are at a point where conservatives must ask the honest question, one that could be answered and shaped this weekend: are we content with being the activists pushing the American system of government, or are we truly striving to be the leaders to improve government for the sake of representing, empowering, and guiding this increasing-diverse nation?

 

Leadership involves guiding and working with a nation full of communities that constantly vary based on the aspects of diversity that have made America the melting pot of the world for centuries. If we are no longer willing to get to know the ingredients that make up today’s melting pot in a tangible way (even when we fundamentally disagree), how can we ever expect to offer the recipe for success in 21st century America, a nation wrought with complex economic, social, and political conundrums?

 

We must listen more, engage more, and lead more. It is time to open our hands, open our ears, and open the door to winning back America. As leaders, our conservatism and subsequent policies must work towards the advancement of the American Dream throughout the diversity of our nation’s communities, including for those that are not conservatives. Freedom, justice, and the pursuit of happiness cannot be only afforded for conservatives through conservative means; they must be available for all Americans through our conservative principles.

 

Therefore, giving up our principles in the process of engaging our nation’s ever-changing diversity should not occur. With a firm understanding of American conservative and the American people (not just conservative history), we should be able to maintain our conservative viewpoints during the discourse of leadership. We do not have to change our values, but we do need to change the belief that the loudest, angriest, or meanest arguments or politicos are the ones that will win the day for conservative values during contested elections and debates. Our passion has not been enough. Our anger at the dysfunction of government has not been enough. Therefore, we have to show that we love this nation – and even our diversity across the land – more than we hate the current state of affairs. At some point, we will have to show that we love America enough to embrace our political adversaries during the process of correcting the wayward course of our nation, many of their perspectives, and most of our collective interactions. This is what Reagan did. This is what Lincoln did. Both did it with resiliency and affability. This is what Obama was supposed to do. This is what must be done now by us conservatives.

 

We claim Republicans from President Lincoln to Dr. Martin Luther King without embracing one of the essential elements that made them great: loving our countrymen past their political, social, and civic flaws during the process of reuniting a hurting, scared, and weary nation. Starting now, the passion – and perhaps even the anger – of our activism as conservatives must grow into a loving zeal for leadership. That is the only way to build a bridge for new voters and disillusioned Americans to walk in order to follow us during policy-making processes and at election time.

 

America is not at a point any longer where loud activism that reflects more anger than optimism is going to be enough to change the course of mediocrity, joblessness, urban jeopardy, and national bankruptcy that we are on right now. We have an obligation to do more. We will see – and hear of – conservative activism and rhetoric over the coming days and months. However, now is not the time to merely be active or loud. It is time to lead and inspire. It is time to lead in an inviting manner that has the strength of conviction and the smile of reassuring composure in ways that comfort a nervous nation. It is time to lead the fullness of America – not just red-state America – as we reclaim American Exceptionalism. It is time to stop worrying about being heard. It’s time to finally be listened to by more Americans, which – if we are focused correctly – will give us the opportunity to lead a fractured nation sorely in need of leadership, not just activate our base.

Lenny McAllister is a nationally-renowned conservative political commentator and former congressional candidate for Illinois’ 2nd Congressional District.

READ: “Meet Lenny McAllister, an Intriguing GOP Name in Chicago’s House Race”

In Articles, Lenny for Congress on January 11, 2013 at 3:18 pm
“I think first I would define myself as a child of God...(s)omebody that is a leader...I am a Republican, but I am definitely not of the current stereotype...(someone) who embraces conservative principles and understands where conservative principles can apply to urban and suburban voting populations in a way that the Republican party has not been successful...(y)et at the same time, not afraid to talk about issues of race, issues of social economics, not afraid to talk about issues that have been impacting the youth, the poor, and the working classes of America..." Read more of Lenny McAllister's interview in National Review Online

“I think first I would define myself as a child of God…(s)omebody that is a leader…I am a Republican, but I am definitely not of the current stereotype…(someone) who embraces conservative principles and understands where conservative principles can apply to urban and suburban voting populations in a way that the Republican party has not been successful…(y)et at the same time, not afraid to talk about issues of race, issues of social economics, not afraid to talk about issues that have been impacting the youth, the poor, and the working classes of America…” Read more of Lenny McAllister’s interview in National Review Online

 

CHICAGO (January 10, 2013) — Noted conservative writer Jim Geraghty featured 2013 US congressional candidate Lenny McAllister (IL-2nd) in a conservation that was featured on National Review Online and National Review this week. The 1300+ word article covered a range of perspectives given by McAllister, providing a glimpse into why Geraghty called McAllister “…an intriguing GOP name in Chicago’s House Race…”

 

 

“Who am I? I think first I would define myself as a child of God,” McAllister begins. “Somebody that is a leader, that doesn’t follow conventional politics. I am a Republican, but I am definitely not of the current stereotype. I am a Republican who embraces conservative principles and understands where conservative principles can apply to urban and suburban voting populations in a way that the Republican party has not been successful in engaging those voting blocs over the past 30 years. Yet at the same time, I am a Republican not afraid to talk about issues of race, issues of social economics, not afraid to talk about issues that have been impacting the youth, the poor, and the working classes of America…we have an opportunity in 2013 to change that, to change the tone within the Republican party and to change the attention that both sides of the aisle give to districts like this one, and to start working better together.”

 

Read “Meet Lenny McAllister, an Intriguing GOP Name in Chicago’s House Race” in the latest version of National Review Online by clicking the link above or by clicking the picture above.

 

Don’t forget: follow Lenny on Twitter at @lennymcallister, join his Facebook page and spread the word about Lenny for Congress (www.LennyForCongress.com)

 

Lenny McAllister for Illinois’ 2nd Congressional District: #OneBigTeam

 

 

McAllister Statement on the 150th Anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation

In Articles, Lenny for Congress, Speeches on January 1, 2013 at 2:07 pm
The Emancipation Proclamation went into effect January 1, 1863. Read Lenny McAllister's call to action 150 years later.

The Emancipation Proclamation went into effect January 1, 1863. Read Lenny McAllister’s call to action 150 years later.

CHICAGO (January 1, 2013) — Lenny McAllister, upon the national remembrance of the 150th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, issued the following statement:

 

“150 years ago, on January 1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln, through a move wrought by wartime shrewdness and political courage, officially declared freedom for Black people in America that were suffering the inhumane and inconceivable horrors of daily life as slaves in the American South. By enacting this noble move, President Lincoln showed both tactical expertise for the sake of reuniting the nation and visionary leadership for the sake of its future. With a stroke of the pen, President Lincoln both freed Black people from over 200 years of its shared agony while freeing our nation from decades of moral decay and interstate contention. In essence, the nation forged a new path on January 1, 1863 with the bold move for the sake of improving the quality of life within the United States of America for all.

 

“Now, we stand together, gathered at our own moment in time. Just as Lincoln watched the horrors of war, cultural divide, inhumanity, and hopelessness impact the land that he loved, we look over a divided country that is being torn apart by political squabbling, cultural divisiveness, generational poverty, and anxiety concerning the ongoing negative trends of violence, unemployment, and educational deficiencies. 150 years later, we are called – through the power of words, the steps of a movement, and perhaps the stroke of a pen – to be historic ourselves. We are called to join President Lincoln in the same American quest that he continued with the Emancipation Proclamation: to seek justice in order to form a more perfect union where all men are created equal; to secure the pathways where all Americans are capable of pursuing happiness through liberty; and to enact, whenever necessary, a new resurgence of freedom so that the ideals of this great nation – self-governance and freedom for the people, by the people – shall never perish from the earth.

 

“Therefore, we come in remembrance of President Lincoln’s noble act, but we move onward remembering that his work shall be incomplete if we are insufficient in our efforts starting January 1, 2013. In 1863, Lincoln was called to grant freedom from chattel slavery. Today, we are called to facilitate freedom from economic poverty, political depravity, societal alienation, and educational deficiencies.

 

“We are called to free children bound by the societal limitations of inadequate educational channels, inadequate employment opportunities, and inadequate levels of public safety. We are called to free government by the people from the partisan gridlock and philosophical rigidity that forces too many leaders to forget that we are a nation of diversity across the millions, where our strength is in our freedom and the power within our numbers. We are called to free Americans from the restrictive mindset that what we see today – from our inner-city ghettos to the poor of rural America – is how conditions will always remain. We are called to emancipate modern-day America from the binds that hold us back in the 21st century. We are called to break these binds, some self-created and some from years past, just as Lincoln did 150 years ago.

 

“Today, I commit personally to being visionary enough to see a better reality past the economic, political, and societal carnage we see before us now, just as Lincoln did 150 years ago. Today, I commit personally to being courageous enough to find solutions that make sense for today and empower our communities for tomorrow. Today, I commit personally to being focused enough to see a more perfect union as of now, past our previous disagreements or points of contention. I believe that there are plenty of Americans that will honor President Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation with their personal commitments to a better America starting today as well. I welcome us to celebrate Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation, not just by looking back on the significance of that moment 150 years ago, but also through keeping daily remembrance of the significance of this moment today for the sake of the next 150 years of this wonderful nation. I look forward to doing so, together, as One Big Team.

 

“May God watch over us all in 2013 and may He bless the United States of America.”

________________________________________________________________________

Political commentator and community advocate Lenny McAllister is the “Working Man’s Conservative” currently seeking office in Illinois’ vacant 2nd Congressional District seat.

For more information, go to LennyForCongress.com or call 773-492-0509.

###

 

READ: McAllister Op-Ed on Tackling Poverty (Orlando Sentinel)

In Articles, Lenny for Congress on December 17, 2012 at 11:10 am

Orlando Sentinel (edit)

ORLANDO, FL (December 14, 2012) –  “One…goal — and thus, one such choice — is the need to fill the hole of poverty that too many Americans are falling into. Merely hoping to maintain the patches that satisfy needs of the moment, not heal our society, is not good enough. It is true: These fine Americans need aid to survive their daily challenges. Charities help them do so…However, these Americans’ primary goal — as is ours collectively — is to achieve the American dream. Charities can do only so much to aid that purpose. Economic, educational and employment stability are the only avenues to make self-perpetuating prosperity a staple in more Americans’ lives.”

US Congressional candidate Lenny McAllister (Illinois, 2nd District) was featured as an op-ed writer in the Friday edition of the Orlando Sentinel, the primary newspaper of the Orlando metropolitan area and a publication managed by the Chicago Tribune. His piece, “Growth Incentives are More Important to Heal Society”, can be found HERE

“Americans who donate resources at a high level must be encouraged to place as many tax-free resources as possible into eradicating problems that cause long-term poverty for many Americans in the 21st century: ongoing failures in our education system, an outlook of shortages of doctors and nurses, and an inability to innovate at the rate we previously had for decades.

“‘Economic patriotism’” cannot be defined as providing charitable contributions while sitting on much-needed investment capital for growth, as we have seen with some financial institutions and private entities since 2008. It must be defined with an environment where re-strengthening America involves a thoughtful direction of resources that fill the gap between struggling Americans and their potential.”

 

Read more by Lenny McAllister by visiting the <SPEECHES> section of www.LennyMcAllister.com

 

Lenny McAllister for Illinois’ 2nd Congressional District: #OneBigTeam

In the Era of Honey Boo Boo, Could Conservatives Still be Touched By an Angel in Primetime?

In Articles on September 30, 2012 at 10:32 am

In the era of cutting-edge reality shows, could Monica and Tess survive in primetime the same way that brass youngsters and dating shows do?

The more liberally-tolerant we are asked to be on mainstream television, the less we see of tolerance towards traditional values in non-news programming.

 

“Modern Family” once again won the Emmy for Best Comedy Series. After 31 nominations over3 years, it is clear that the well-written series deserves its place in the lineup. The show’s stance as a primetime example of modern-day tolerance towards gay couples is an after thought. After all, the show’s pretty darn funny.

“George Lopez” broke ground a decade ago on network television with its sitcom. Today, the show dominates the Nick-At-Nite lineup, coming into the lives of millions of viewers that missed the first run of the series years ago. Of course, the fact that they were Latinos was a noteworthy item when the series started, a focal point that was lost on its beloved audience after the first side-splitting laughs.

From the reality show perspective, the roof always seems to be raised, even as the standards seem to continue to drop. From Flavor of Love to Here Comes Honey Boo Boo, there seems to be a bevy of shows that entertainment, break social mores, and approach the issue of tolerance. There are shows about the supernatural evils of big money, gruesome fairy tales, political murder, and vampires.

I looked at today’s lineup and asked myself: where are the mainstream shows that conservatives could feel good about today? Aside from Fox News, where are the non-political shows (notably in the primetime schedule on network or cable) that Christian conservatives could enjoy?

After a throwback TV night on GMC, I wonder aloud if America is tolerant enough to have another show like Touched by An Angel, a popular regular series that actively and openly talks about God, morality, and Christian values. We pride ourselves as a nation to be able to view progressive-leaning programming in the mainstream. We uphold our ability to broadcast Muslim-cast reality series and shows with gay lead characters alike with a sense of pride in our social advancement. Yet, even as we move down that path, have we gotten to a point where a show like Touched by An Angel would be seen as “too Christian” for our television sets in today’s primetime schedule? Would sponsors and viewers see the value in such a sappy but quality Christian conservative show as they did for nearly a decade?

If not, what does that say about us as a nation?

People consider conservatives to be off the rails whenever Christians claim that religious freedoms are extended to non-Christian believers and agnostics faster (through lawsuits and the like) than they are to Christians in our society nowadays. A brief look at our entertainment landscape may show otherwise, however. In a land where anyone or anything has been capable of making money and having their “15 minutes of fame”, why does it seem as though the Christian conservative perspective (even the most benign of viewpoints within that realm) is being written off, more often than not, as being too radical for modern mainstream America?

When some conservatives talk about taking back America to a better time, perhaps they are referring to an era such as a few short years ago, a time when God can be discussed on network television on a weekly basis from a Christian perspective without scores of protests or mounds of legislation being filed. If so, I concur. I miss an America that allows for young people and families to experience entertainment in mainstream entertainment where Christian perspectives are not rejected, but embraced. Despite the successes of projects such as the Left Behind series and Fireproof, it is sad that in a nation where Christian values played a role in multiple events that shaped our landscape (from the abolition of slavery to the 20th century civil rights movement), the comfort level that Christianity enjoys in the mainstream media, world of entertainment, and national conversation continues to diminish. Even throughout our capitalistic past, Americans have found a way to make money in the entertainment world through the advancement of Christian stories in the mainstream, from Christmas specials that fearlessly mentioned Christ  to borrowing Christian themes for modern cinematic classics. Yet now, the most congenial of Christianity in much of America is often relegated to the also-ran channels of cable lineups and genre-specific providers. Our society is progressive enough these days to include in our entertainment families headed by gay couples, abortion-based show themes, and politically-charged story arcs. However, we seem to have progressed past the point of including the God of our American forefathers – the same God that President Lincoln embraced during the Civil War and Southern Baptists embraced while facing down Jim Crow. It might be nice if we can regress our entertainment clocks back just a little bit if that means that we can get a little more God into our secular lives through our television and other forms of mainstream entertainment. In order to stop incurring so many boo boos during these turbulent times, perhaps it is high time to get back to putting a few more angels in our programming.

Catch “From An Angel to a Honey Boo Boo” also on Politic365.

Pick up a copy of “Spoken Thoughts of an Amalgamated Advocate in Today’s America” today!

From Ratibirds to Republican Opponents: The Right Way to “Hate” an Archrival

In Articles on September 30, 2012 at 9:30 am

As much as arch-rivals may hate each other, a healthy dose of respect for each other ups the levels of strategy, execution, and results for participants and viewers alike. It is a lesson that Republicans should apply to the 2012 election over the last 5 weeks.

 

It might help Governor Romney in Pennsylvania and in the battleground states to take some NFL advice from Steelers Nation.

 

The NFL season is a great time to bring out the best in Americans. We are passionate about our football. We love our teams. It exudes a lot of pride in our cities (or hometowns) and the past victories (in the case of Steelers Nation, 6 Super Bowl victories) that come with rooting for the great football team.

 

There is also a lot to learn about sports and competition, even in the nuances of the game.

 

Those paying attention can learn about valuing respect over hate. They can learn about sticking with a game plan instead of acting out of desperation. They can learn about late-minute victories and avoiding blow-outs with costly mistakes.

 

If the Romney campaign is looking for a little inspiration and notes for how to approach the final five weeks of the election in order to capture victory at this late moment of the game, they could look to the most passionate rivalry in the NFL.

 

Steelers-Ravens.

 

Steelers Nation and the Pittsburgh Steelers team organization may not hate the Ravens, but they certainly strongly dislike them. Both teams have had their share of stinging victories over the other (although the Ravens have yet to win a playoff game against their avowed archrival). Yet, through all of the hard hits and talking trash, there is always an underlining principle that makes the confrontations great ones that benefit the teams and the NFL alike: a healthy amount of genuine respect for each other’s talents and accomplishments – just enough to temper zeal with rationale.

 

The Romney campaign needs to find the same towards President Obama if Governor Romney’s likeability numbers and polling results in key battleground states are going to turn around throughout the last 5 weeks.

 

Governor Romney’s best bet for convincing the small amount of 2008 Obama voters to side with him will be for the campaign tone to go back to showing respect for the president personally, but the need for a change from the president next term. That is much of what the nation is again experiencing from the Romney-Ryan messaging over the past few days. It is a sound strategy. Every time the Republican presidential ticket gets caught up in the overzealous, over-emotional attacks on President Obama in a narrow fashion (e.g., one that focuses on urban myth or questionable tactics), the polling numbers go down, leaving the GOP playing catch-up. In this race, every moment where Republicans are playing catch up in a climate where the economy is risking another recession, the Obama team feels more confident about victory, regardless of their own performance.

 

Catch the whole article, “How to Hate an Archrival” on Politic365.

Pick up a copy of “Spoken Thoughts of an Amalgamated Advocate in Today’s America” today!

6 Months Later, Are You Still Working for #Justice4Trayvon

In Articles on September 28, 2012 at 2:09 pm

At the end of 2012, do we as a nation still have the same zeal and activism in play to correct the social, political, and civic wrongs that we faced through the conversations surrounding the Trayvon Martin tragedy?

Six months after the eruption of the Trayvon Martin tragedy, are you still wearing your hoodie?

 

It is a simple question with a powerful message behind it:

 

Are you still wearing your hoodie?

 

It has been six months since the height of the outrage behind the Trayvon Martin killing and the on-again, off-again nature of arresting George Zimmerman.  It has been six months since President Obama was pressed into making a comment on the tragedy. It has been six months since former Republican presidential candidates such as Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum criticized Mr. Obama on his “race-baiting” comments (of course, after controversial “race-baiting” comments of their own).  It has been six months since the Rev. Al Sharpton led protests down in Florida, much to the chagrin of conservatives nationally. It has been six months since some Black Republicans articulated why more Republicans and conservatives must get involved consistently and appropriately in the struggle for civil rights (especially for minorities) if they are going to shed the label of racist and the influence of the left over a growing voting bloc.

 

Yet, all of it is in vain if, in spirit, you are not still involved.

 

Proverbially-speaking, are you still wearing your hoodie?

 

Minorities in America have faced a growing slew of issues over these past six months. The Pennsylvania Voter ID law that has become a national fixation (and quite possibly struck-down law due to its implementation) was passed in March. The explosion of youth violence and death in Chicago took fire in the spring. Black unemployment officially remains over 14% nationally, with unofficial numbers towering over that rate for Black youth and other eligible Black workers in urban communities. The Supreme Court has ruled on Arizona’s SB 1070. President Obama has handed down an executive order this summer impacting droves of Latinos living in America. We have seen some speak out about the social conditions facing Black Americans and others, from the NAACP to pro-life advocates.

 

Yet, collectively in these critical political and social times, where are we? Do we still have our hoodies on?

 

Perhaps a better question is: do we still have our ears open and our thinking caps on?

 

The amount of activism surrounding the Trayvon Martin situation – and with it, the movement to learn the nuisances and inconsistent applications of “stand your ground” laws nationally – was supposed to spark young people and others to view the situation as a game-changing event. This was supposed to be the issue that sparked a movement of Americans (notably minorities and young people) to examine our collective involvement in the political and civic arenas and elevate our contributions, hoping to improve America in the process.

 

Well, have we?

 

Has the Trayvon Martin outrage towards the skewed prism of applying justice in America gone the way of the outrage towards the misogyny in our communities, highlighted by the 2011 gang rape of an 11-year-old girl in Texas? Were these stories sparks to push a movement or news stories that ginned up emotionalism without ongoing activism?

 

Has the activism around the Florida-based case been enough to get young people involved in the political process in 2012 with a full understanding that, through expressing their voices via suffrage, they impact races for district attorneys and sheriffs alike? Is the driving force from #Justice4Trayvon limited to misguided incidents of vigilante violence and voting for President Obama in order to “stick it to ‘The Man’”, or does it have a deeper understanding and obligation towards civic involvement that has taken root?

 

Catch the whole article, “Where’s Your Hoodie?” on Politic365.

Pick up a copy of “Spoken Thoughts of an Amalgamated Advocate in Today’s America” today!

Chicken Jobs or Just Scratch: The Ongoing Fight over Gay Marriage in Chicago

In Articles on September 28, 2012 at 1:57 pm

If Chicago communities are looking for good treats, tasty treats, and new jobs by way of Chick-fil-A franchises, they may be disappointed should the social stance that Alderman Joe Moreno (pictured left) is taking has anything to do with it.

In a bad economy and with a city in crisis, a Chicago alderman chooses to make gay marriage advocacy a priority over potential job creation.

 

In the ongoing game of chicken that pits Chick-fil-A against gay marriage advocates, it seems as though the only people that may get run over in Chicago are those looking for the economic benefits of a new establishment coming to town.

 

Granted, no one will ever confuse working for a fast food restaurant with a middle-class job. As well, bringing a fast food chain to a region may not yield the same type of economic boom as, say, Caterpillar does to East Peoria and other Illinois towns. However, in a state where the unemployment rate is a full percentage point higher than the national average of 8.1% and the unemployment rate in Chicago is also above the national average, jobs are a blessing. That is doubly so for a town ravaged by a wave of violence initiated by youth facing educational issues and urban plight. Anything that can be used to calm down the tension stoked up over the past year or so in the Windy City must be considered, encouraged, and leveraged by community leadership, especially those at the very top of government.

 

Yet, instead of tackling these current challenges, for some, it is more important to vet potential economic creators over a controversial issue that is not even legal in the state of Illinois.

 

Perspectives from all sides of the issue concerning the gay marriage argument have merit. Those viewpoints have come in from public officials, community activists, and media types alike. Yet, just as much as social issues have been driving the national conversation in this cantankerous election cycle, there is one issue that has been more of a firestorm-maker than all others: jobs.

 

When bringing the conversation back to jobs again, the stance of Chicago Alderman Joe Moreno comes across as that much more overzealous and inappropriate.

 

Although the state of Illinois formerly recognizes civil unions for same-sex couples and Chick-fil-A has clarified that they will not discriminate against any employee based on race, creed, or sexual orientation, Alderman Moreno seems to remain willing to hold up approval for the expansion of Chick-fil-A franchises into Chicago based on the company’s continued traditional marriage stance. His political posturing – seen as standing for social justice for a select few on a very controversial issue – does not stand for the greater good in the larger sense in light of the city’s collection of woes.

 

In a situation where gay couples already have civic protections under state law and community conditions warrant holistic civic victories, Moreno’s stance comes off as both politically selfish and constituently narrow.  Although the alderman primarily represents one district full of voters, his votes serve as one voice among the 50 most powerful voices in the nation’s third-largest city. As such, his obligation remains beholden to the greater good to the city concerning economic development and educational opportunities – potential avenues for the struggling classes of Chicago to utilize should Chick-fil-A come to town.

 

Moreno is playing chicken with the fast food franchise, leaving Chicago residents in the middle of the economic highway that has already been zooming by without them for years now. Instead of fighting for a greater sense of justice (i.e., economic justice and educational justice for Chicago communities), Moreno chooses to fight what he perceives to be illegal and oppressive social stances with a questionably un-American stance of his own. That is the greater and oft-overlooked tragedy. Perhaps it is honorable for the alderman to stand for what he believes. No one has a problem with Americans voicing their beliefs, even when dissenting views are juxtaposed. Yet, the paradox in this instance is clear: Moreno’s position to block Chick-fil-A’s expansion on the grounds of championing gay marriage civil rights comes with the caveat of Moreno actively blocking Dan Cathy’s constitutional rights via the First Amendment – namely, the right to free speech and freedom of religion – through discriminating against Cathy and his businesses through political means.

 

Let us be clear: being pro-traditional marriage does not necessarily translate into hating gay Americans, nor should it. As long as Cathy’s organization does not discriminate as an employer and does not propagate hate against a group of Americans, the overall benefits to the community must outweigh the social controversy when the Chick-fil-A expansion issue sits on the desk of a Chicago alderman. It is the same “greater good” argument that the Democrat-controlled Chicago City Council embraces whenever companies with controversial ties to Planned Parenthood (such as Whole Foods) seek to expand their businesses into Chicago neighborhoods (as is the case with the supermarket in the Hyde Park area).

 

Catch the whole article, “Chicken Jobs or Social Stances in Chicago?” on Politic365.

Pick up a copy of “Spoken Thoughts of an Amalgamated Advocate in Today’s America” today!

Loyal to the Union while Loyal to the People? Black Teachers and the Chicago Dilemma

In Articles on September 5, 2012 at 3:55 pm

With the high amount of gun play and the low amount of opportunities currently going on in disadvantaged parts of Chicago, can many CPS students really afford a strike that delays the start of the school year?

Should Black teachers in the CTU break ranks with the union to prevent a CPS strike, showing more unity to disadvantaged Black youth than to their union brethren for the sake of these students?

There are plenty of Americans that do not hate unions. I know that I do not. Until recently, my father was a member of a local union before retiring. Unions have a place in America, even today.
However, when it comes to teachers unions in places like (urban)war-torn Chicago, the message must be clear: on the priority scale, children’s needs have a greater place in America than unions’ requests.
For Black union members of the CTU (Chicago Teachers Union), this reality presents an interesting contrast of perspectives that they have to address.

Ironically, in the week after Black Republicans such as Mia Love have taken loads of cantankerous criticism based on claims of aligning themselves more with a group’s desires than with the best interests of their communities, Black teachers in Chicago will be forced to take on the same question. With Chicago teachers poised to strike on September 10 over union concerns including pay increases, a new teacher evaluation process, and hiring leniency for principals when laid off union members are involved, many Black members of the union will have to ask themselves the question that many African-Americans (such as Black Republicans in Tampa) were asked recently.

Black teachers in Chicago must ask themselves: are you willing to speak out against the direction that your team is headed towards – and, perhaps, avoid a crippling strike – for the sake of vulnerable Black people?

Make no mistake: the purpose of a union is to advocate for the best interests of its constituents for the purpose of leveraging as much affluence and benefits as possible within any given situation. In many ways, this is similar to the role of a political party. Thus, in the same way that Black Republicans often must choose between co-signing on the questionable rhetoric that has come from conservatives concerning race from time to time, Black teachers in Chicago now have a similar moral dilemma. They must look at the conditions facing our children and determine if going along with 98% of CTU members that voted for a strike this fall is the right thing to do, considering the tragic levels of violence, educational gaps, and unemployment facing our children in the south and west sides of the city.

From a corporate standpoint, they have no other choice but to back their union family and push for their demands. After all, they are dues-paying union members. From their historical obligation, they have no recourse but to buck back against the trend and work to prevent this strike. After all, they are Black people that represent the gateway for social and economic equality for our children.

Black children in Chicago are already facing a mountain of woes, hardship, and social instabilities that make the path towards contributing as successful members of 21st century America a rocky one. Amid the Second City Shoot-fest of 2012 throughout areas such as Englewood, South Shore, Pill Hill, and (my old stomping grounds) of Hyde Park/Woodlawn, these children are in no position to have any part of their school year delayed. Fights over mandating that principals re-hire laid-off union teachers (instead of the best-possible teaching candidates, including non-union members), stopping the introduction of merit pay measures based on student performance, and preventing public funding to go towards charter schools is not enough for Black workers to strike over at a time when Black children are at the brink of permanent irrelevancy as Americans. At a time when over 80% of CPS students qualify for the free lunch program (most of whom are Black or Latino) and often attend schools with gang warfare going on outside, Black teacher union members will have to question whether a struggle over receiving compensation from the Board of Education to pay for teachers’ extra education is worth jeopardizing Black youth’s health and safety at this critical and dangerous point of time.

 

Catch Lenny’s “Teacher’s Strike: A Scholastic Death Sentence or a Choice of Conscience?”on Politic365.com

 

Grab a copy of “Spoken Thoughts of an Amalgamated Advocate in Today’s America”, now available electronically on Kindle and in paperback on Amazon.com

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers